Showing posts with label donald trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label donald trump. Show all posts

9.14.2020

Supporters of Child-Sexualizer-in-Chief outraged by film about sexualization of children

The Right's firestorm over Netflix's acquisition and streaming of the French film, "Cuties" ("Mignonnes") would lead one to believe that they have a zero tolerance policy regarding the sexualization of children.  

Donald Trump Jr has called Netflix's hosting of the film the "normalization of pedophelia and the sexualization of our children." He said of the Democrats who defend the film: "Not a good look!"

Ted Cruz and Tammy Bruce have labeled it "child porn." 

The outcry about the film (which I have not seen), has led to calls for a boycott of Netflix, and several members of Congress have called for a Justice Department investigation

According to Netflix, the French indie film is actually “a social commentary against the sexualization of young children. It’s an award-winning film and a powerful story about the pressure young girls face on social media and from society more generally growing up — and we’d encourage anyone who cares about these important issues to watch the movie.”

The film's director, Maïmouna Doucouré, has stated that the movie pulled from elements of her own childhood in its portrayal of 11-year-old Amy’s struggles between "two distinct modes of femininity: one dictated by the traditional values of her Senegalese and Muslim upbringing, the other by Western society."     

So, we have a national uproar over a female-directed French film that grapples with society's sexualization of young children. Make no mistake -- this is a film that, otherwise, would have debuted on Netflix with little fanfare, and would have found a modest viewership among fans of international cinema and films that address social issues such as Pihu or The Florida Project --not exactly a broad demographic.  

Let's be clear. There is a very big difference between defending the sexualization of children and defending a film about the sexualization of children.  It's fair to say that "Leaving Las Vegas" features intense, challenging scenes depicting substance abuse. It's not fair to say that "Leaving Las Vegas" is pro-substance abuse.  

We can certainly chastise Netflix for their misleading and admittingly inappropriate marketing of the film, but if the Right were truly concerned about the sexualization of children, why have they been so silent about, say, Dance Moms, or Toddlers & Tiaras -- massively popular actual shows about the actual sexualization of actual children?

Why are they not outraged by Donald Trump sexualizing his own 1-year old daughter by openly discussing the future development of her breasts and legs? 

Where is the petition to remove Trump from office for sexualizing a 10-year old girl -- on camera -- by stating, "I'm going to be dating her in ten years?"

How do they feel about the filed affidavit alleging Trump and Epstein raped at 13-year old girl at a party in New York City? 

("I'll go backstage before a show and everyone's getting dressed and ready and everything else...And you know, no men are anywhere. And I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant. And therefore I'm inspecting it...You know they're standing there with no clothes...And so I sort of get away with things like that.")

Or what about the allegations that one of Epstein's victims was recruited at Mar-a-Lago where she worked as a spa attendant

What about when Trump sexualized another daughter when asked what he had in common with her? (He replied, "Sex.")

The female director of "Cuties," who wrote and directed the film to shine a light on the sexualization of children, has received death threats as an outflow of the controversy -- a controversy largely fuelled by Trump, GOP figureheads, and conservative commentators.  

Meanwhile, a great many of those outraged are supporters of Trump, an admitted sexual predator with a well-documented and long history of very real (and very public) sexualization of children, including allegations of child rape. 

Not a good look. 

8.17.2018

Trump's uncanny knack for hiring only the very best worst people


They were the best of people, they were the worst of people.Trump promised excellence. “I’m going to surround myself with only the best and most serious people,” he said in a 2016 interview with The Washington Post. “We want top of the line professionals.”

The rate of turnover in the Trump White House is wholly unprecedented, exceeding that of any other administration in a century — interesting, given Trump’s 2012 tweet ridiculing President Barack Obama for his (much lower) turnover rate:

Reviewing the history of Trump hirings and firings, a pattern emerges. Like some kind of reverse King Midas, every Trump hire is turned from the best person in the world to the absolute worst person ever, in a very short amount of time.
Let’s have a look at some of Trump’s most jarring 180s of the past several months:
Trump on George Papadopoulos
March 2016: “An excellent guy.”
October 2017: “Low level volunteer…who has already been proven to be a liar.”
Trump on Omarosa Manigault Newman
2016: “She’s a wonderful woman…She has done so much for me…she is a fine person…you are amazing. She works so hard, she feels so strongly.”
2018: “Wacky Omarosa…She was vicious, but not smart…nasty…a loser…nothing but problems…a lowlife.”
Trump on Steve Bannon
October 2017: “I have a very good relationship with Steve Bannon. Steve’s been a friend of mine for a long time. I like Steve a lot.
January 2018: “Sloppy Steve Bannon…a dog.” “Poor…a liar.”

Trump on Michael Cohen
April 2018: “A fine person with a wonderful family.”
July 2018: “Unethical…scumbag.  He’s a horrible person.”

There are only a few conclusions we can draw from Trump’s pattern of hiring only the best people who are also really terrible people that he must fire:
  1. He’s a bullsh**ter
  2. He’s an absolute terrible judge of character

Science tells us that those who are most susceptible to bulls**t are less analytic and less intelligent.  (I will leave it up to readers to make any inferences here about Trump’s base.)

Science also tells us that intelligent people are better judges of character. Trump insists he’s a “stable genius” with a high IQ, but, as Stephen Hawking said, “People who boast about their IQ are losers.”

Trump’s public adulations of several notorious dictators also lends credence to the notion that he’s not very good at judging character. (After all, this is the guy who trusts ex-KGB agents more than he trusts US intelligence.)

Of course, it’s entirely possible that Trump is both a bullsh**ter and a terrible judge of character.  Either way, not the qualities you’d want in, say, the treasurer of your homeowners association, or your pet sitter.
Yet, these are the qualities of the man entrusted to make crucial decisions on the behalf of 322 million American citizens. We have a bullsh**ter, who is also a terrible judge of character, sitting in closed-door meetings with a hostile foreign power.

We may not be able to fire him, exactly, but perhaps those who thought Trump was the best person for the job now see that he is, in fact, the worst. Like so many Trump hires, maybe Trump will be sent packing, disparaged by the once-fawning masses as he walks out the door — a fitting return to civilian life for a man who bullsh**ted his way into the White House.

4.25.2011

Franklin Graham: Jesus' Return to Include Twitter, YouTube. Also, Trump is "Candidate of Choice"

Franklin Graham, the son of the more eloquent and compassionate evangelist Billy Graham, stated on ABC's This Week that in order to fulfill scriptural claims, the second coming will incorporate social media.

Graham said:
"The Bible says that every eye is going to see (the second coming). How is the whole world going to see (Jesus Christ) all at one time? I don't know, unless all of a sudden everybody's taking pictures and it's on the media worldwide. I don't know. Social media could have a big part in that...
Everybody's got their phone up and everybody's taking recordings and posting it on YouTube and whatever and sending it to you, and it gets shown around the world."
 Graham, who previously has shown a fondness for Sarah Palin, also stated that Donald Trump is his "candidate of choice."
"Donald Trump, when I first saw that he was getting in, I thought, well, this has got to be a joke. But the more you listen to him, the more you say to yourself, you know, maybe this guy's right."
 Kind of makes one second-guess Franklin's previous prediction.